SECTION-WISE VERIFIED CASE DIGEST (TP ACT)

πŸ“˜ SECTION-WISE VERIFIED CASE DIGEST (TP ACT)


πŸ”Ή SECTION 5 – Transfer of Property

  • Narandas Karsondas v. S.A. Kamtam
    πŸ‘‰ Agreement to sell does not create interest in property

πŸ”Ή SECTION 6 – What may be transferred

  • Gopal Saran v. Satyanarayana
    πŸ‘‰ Spes successionis (chance of heirship) not transferable

πŸ”Ή SECTION 8 – Operation of transfer

  • State of U.P. v. Zahoor Ahmad
    πŸ‘‰ Transfer includes all interests unless contrary intention

πŸ”Ή SECTION 10 – Restraint on alienation

  • Raja Rajeshwari v. Puran Indoria
    πŸ‘‰ Absolute restraint on transfer = void

πŸ”Ή SECTION 14 – Rule against perpetuity

  • Raja Bajrang Bahadur Singh v. Thakurain Bakhtraj Kuer
    πŸ‘‰ Remote vesting beyond permissible limit = void

πŸ”Ή SECTION 35 – Doctrine of Election

  • C. Beepathuma v. Velasari Shankaranarayana Kadambolithaya
    πŸ‘‰ Cannot accept benefit and reject burden

πŸ”Ή SECTION 41 – Ostensible Owner

  • Hardev Singh v. Gurmail Singh
    πŸ‘‰ Bona fide purchaser protected if:
  • Good faith
  • Reasonable care

πŸ”Ή SECTION 43 – Feeding the Grant by Estoppel

  • Jumma Masjid v. Kodimaniandra Deviah
    πŸ‘‰ Later acquired title feeds earlier defective transfer

πŸ”Ή SECTION 52 – Lis Pendens

  • Rajender Singh v. Santa Singh
    πŸ‘‰ Transfer during litigation = subject to decree

πŸ”Ή SECTION 53 – Fraudulent Transfer

  • Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd.
    πŸ‘‰ Transfer to defeat creditors = voidable

πŸ”Ή SECTION 53A – Part Performance

  • K.B. Saha & Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Development Consultant Ltd.
    πŸ‘‰ Requires:
  • Written contract
  • Possession
  • Willingness

πŸ‘‰ Only defensive right


πŸ”Ή SECTION 54 – Sale

  • Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Haryana
    πŸ‘‰ GPA/Agreement β‰  Sale
  • Narandas Karsondas v. S.A. Kamtam
    πŸ‘‰ Ownership passes only by registered sale deed

πŸ”Ή SECTION 58 – Mortgage

  • Pandit Chunchun Jha v. Sheikh Ebadat Ali
    πŸ‘‰ Intention determines mortgage vs sale

πŸ”Ή SECTION 60 – Right of Redemption

  • Narandas Karsondas v. S.A. Kamtam
    πŸ‘‰ Right of redemption is statutory and cannot be clogged

πŸ”Ή SECTION 91 – Who may redeem

  • Ganga Dhar v. Shankar Lal
    πŸ‘‰ Persons interested in equity of redemption can redeem

πŸ”Ή SECTION 105 – Lease

  • Associated Hotels of India Ltd. v. R.N. Kapoor
    πŸ‘‰ Lease vs License β†’ intention + exclusive possession

πŸ”Ή SECTION 107 – Lease how made

  • Anthony v. K.C. Ittoop & Sons
    πŸ‘‰ Lease >1 year requires registration

πŸ”Ή SECTION 111 – Determination of Lease

  • Shaha Ratansi Khimji & Sons v. Kumbhar Sons Hotel Pvt. Ltd.
    πŸ‘‰ Lease termination strictly as per statute

πŸ”Ή SECTION 118 – Exchange

  • Ram Kristo Mandal v. Dhankisto Mandal
    πŸ‘‰ Exchange = mutual transfer of ownership

πŸ”Ή SECTION 122 – Gift

  • Kalyan Singh v. Smt. Chhoti
    πŸ‘‰ Acceptance during lifetime is mandatory

πŸ”Ή SECTION 123 – Transfer how effected (Gift)

  • Renikuntla Rajamma v. K. Sarwanamma
    πŸ‘‰ Registration + acceptance = valid gift

πŸ”Ή SECTION 130 – Actionable Claim

  • ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Official Liquidator of APS Star Industries Ltd.
    πŸ‘‰ Actionable claim transferable by written instrument

πŸ“Š GUJARAT LAW REPORTER (GLR – SAFE ENTRY)


πŸ”Ή Mutation vs Title

  • Heirs of deceased Gordhanbhai v. State of Gujarat
    πŸ‘‰ Mutation entry = fiscal purpose only, not title

🧠 FINAL REVISION (COURT USE)

πŸ‘‰ Must-cite backbone cases:

  • Suraj Lamp β†’ Sale
  • Narandas Karsondas β†’ No interest
  • K.B. Saha β†’ Sec 53A
  • Rajender Singh β†’ Lis pendens
  • Hardev Singh β†’ Ostensible owner
  • Associated Hotels β†’ Lease vs License

15 thoughts on “SECTION-WISE VERIFIED CASE DIGEST (TP ACT)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!