10 tricky, exam-oriented case studies on remand, each linked to leading Supreme Court precedents.
π§ 1οΈβ£ Custody in One FIR, Remand in Another
Problem
Accused is in judicial custody in FIR-1. Police seek police custody in FIR-2 without formally arresting him in FIR-2. Is it valid?
Law
β Not valid without formal arrest and production.
Authority
Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand
π§ 2οΈβ£ Default Bail Applied After Charge-Sheet Filed
Problem
Statutory period expired. Before accused files default bail application, charge-sheet is filed. Can accused claim default bail?
Law
β Right lost if application not filed before charge-sheet.
Authority
Sanjay Dutt v. State
π§ 3οΈβ£ Application Filed After Expiry but Before Filing Charge-Sheet
Problem
Accused applies for default bail on Day 91. Charge-sheet filed later same day. Is bail maintainable?
Law
β Yes. Right crystallizes on expiry + filing application.
Authority
Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra
π§ 4οΈβ£ Wrong Calculation of 60 vs 90 Days
Problem
Offence punishable βup to 10 years.β Court grants 90 days instead of 60. Valid?
Law
β 60 days applies where punishment is up to 10 years.
Authority
Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam
π§ 5οΈβ£ Magistrate Grants Remand Without Recording Reasons
Problem
Remand order is mechanical; no reasons recorded. Challengeable?
Law
β Yes. Remand must reflect judicial application of mind.
Authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
π§ 6οΈβ£ Arrest Without Necessity
Problem
Accused arrested for offence punishable up to 3 years without Section 41A notice. Remand granted. Legal?
Law
β Arrest invalid; remand vulnerable.
Authority
Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
π§ 7οΈβ£ Police Custody After First 15 Days
Problem
Police seek custody after accused has been in judicial custody for 20 days. Permissible?
Law
β Police custody only within first 15 days of remand cycle.
Authority
CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
π§ 8οΈβ£ UAPA Extension Without Proper Public Prosecutor Report
Problem
Court extends remand to 180 days without detailed report of Public Prosecutor. Valid?
Law
β Extension requires reasoned report and judicial satisfaction.
Authority
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra
π§ 9οΈβ£ Custody Beyond 24 Hours Without Production
Problem
Accused produced after 30 hours. Remand granted. Valid?
Law
β Violates Article 22(2) & CrPC.
Authority
D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
π§ π Default Bail in One Case but Custody Continues in Another
Problem
Accused gets default bail in FIR-1 but remains in jail due to FIR-2. Is release automatic?
Law
β Release only in that specific case; custody continues if valid in FIR-2.
Authority
Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand
π― Core Exam Traps Covered
β Multiple FIR remand manipulation
β Police custody limits
β Default bail timing traps
β UAPA extension errors
β Mechanical remand orders
β 60 vs 90 day confusion
β Arrest illegality impact on remand