⚖ 100 CASE-NAME RAPID RECALL (EVIDENCE & CRIMINAL LAW)

Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh → FIR mandatory for cognizable offence
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal → Seven categories for quashing FIR
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra → Five golden circumstantial principles
Hanumant Govind Nargundkar v. State of Madhya Pradesh → Circumstances must exclude innocence
Kali Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh → Benefit of doubt doctrine
Vadivelu Thevar v. State of Madras → Sole witness sufficient conviction
Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan → Accomplice corroboration prudence rule
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay → Dying declaration sufficient alone
Laxman v. State of Maharashtra → Doctor certification not mandatory
Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor → Discovery portion only admissible

Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer → 65B certificate mandatory electronic
Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal → Reaffirmed mandatory 65B compliance
Sonu v. State of Haryana → 65B objection must timely
Sahadevan v. State of Tamil Nadu → Extra-judicial confession reliable possible
State of Punjab v. Barkat Ram → Police confession inadmissible absolute
Tehsildar Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh → Prior statements contradiction use
Budhsen v. State of Uttar Pradesh → TIP corroborative not substantive
Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra → Child witness competent reliable
State of U.P. v. Ramesh Prasad Misra → Hostile witness partly reliable
H. Siddiqui v. A. Ramalingam → Foundational facts before secondary evidence

J. Yashoda v. K. Shobha Rani → Secondary evidence strict conditions
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat → Minor discrepancies immaterial
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand → Bail rule jail exception
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab → Anticipatory bail discretionary principle
Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) → Anticipatory bail no fixed duration
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar → Arrest checklist mandatory compliance
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal → Custodial safeguards mandatory procedures
Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI → Arrest last resort principle
Siddharth v. State of Uttar Pradesh → Charge-sheet without arrest permissible
Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand → Re-arrest requires bail cancellation

Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya v. State of Gujarat → Magistrate order further investigation
K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala → Further not fresh investigation
T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala → Second FIR barred same incident
Upkar Singh v. Ved Prakash → Counter FIR legally maintainable
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate → Summoning serious judicial act
Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal → Strong suspicion frame charge
Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander → No mini trial charge stage
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi → Defence material not considered discharge
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab → Quashing allowed private disputes
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab → Serious offences not quashable compromise

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab → Rarest rare death penalty
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab → Guidelines rarest rare application
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Gian Chand → Delay FIR not fatal
Baijnath v. State of Madhya Pradesh → Dowry death presumption conditional
Rohitbhai Jivanlal Patel v. State of Gujarat → NI Act presumption mandatory
Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam → Default bail sixty days
Enforcement Directorate v. Kapil Wadhawan → Default period from first remand
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement → Triple test bail consideration
Bharat Barrel & Drum Mfg. Co. v. Amin Chand Pyarelal → Presumption rebuttable by probabilities
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu → Conspiracy evidence admissibility

Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra → Custodial death adverse inference possible
State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram → False explanation strengthens prosecution
Naina Mohamed v. State of Tamil Nadu → Last seen needs proximity time
Satpal Singh v. State of Haryana → Recovery corroborates prosecution version
Mohd. Aman v. State of Rajasthan → TIP delay reduces credibility
Dana Yadav v. State of Bihar → Dock identification cautious acceptance
Ram Chandra v. State of Uttar Pradesh → Medical opinion advisory only
Solanki Chimanbhai Ukabhai v. State of Gujarat → Ocular prevails medical inconsistency
State of U.P. v. Krishna Gopal → Minor contradictions insignificant
Leela Ram v. State of Haryana → Discrepancies natural human errors

Rattan Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh → Falsus in uno rejected
State of Punjab v. Jagir Singh → Prosecution stand independently strong
Sharadamma v. State of Karnataka → Suspicion cannot replace proof
State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh → Section 313 valuable circumstance
Hate Singh Bhagat Singh v. State of Madhya Bharat → 313 statement not evidence
Binay Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar → Alibi strict proof required
Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab → Private defence probabilised sufficient
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal → Courts must avoid hypertechnicality
Madan Gopal Kakkad v. Naval Dubey → Admission substantive against maker
Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal → Admission best possible evidence

Gopal Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh → Extra-judicial confession weak evidence
Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Administration) → Conspiracy proved circumstantially possible
Bodhraj v. State of Jammu and Kashmir → Last seen requires corroboration
Ramreddy Rajesh Khanna Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh → Circumstantial chain fully complete
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra → Proof beyond doubt realistic approach
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony → Evidence appreciated as whole
Appabhai v. State of Gujarat → Witness exaggeration partly acceptable
Karnel Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh → Investigation lapses not fatal
State of Karnataka v. K. Yarappa Reddy → Defective investigation not acquittal
Bhagwan Singh v. State of Haryana → Hostile witness partially reliable

Mohanlal Shamji Soni v. Union of India → Court may summon witness
Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat → Fair trial paramount duty
Selvi v. State of Karnataka → Narco tests violate consent
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad → Fingerprints not testimonial compulsion
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection → Illegally obtained evidence admissible
Ritesh Sinha v. State of Uttar Pradesh → Voice sample permissible direction
State of Maharashtra v. Damu → Recovery supports circumstantial chain
C. Muniappan v. State of Tamil Nadu → Motive strengthens prosecution case
Joseph v. State of Kerala → Ocular outweighs medical minor
Vijay Shankar v. State of Haryana → DNA strong corroborative evidence

Nizam v. State of Rajasthan → Last seen plus recovery sufficient
State of U.P. v. Satish → Last seen needs close proximity
Rajendra Prasad v. Narcotic Cell → Court may permit additional evidence
Babu v. State of Kerala → Appellate court slow overturn acquittal
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka → Two views favour accused
State of Rajasthan v. Teja Ram → Seizure witness hostility immaterial
Ghurey Lal v. State of Uttar Pradesh → Acquittal strengthens presumption innocence
Hema v. State → Section 27 strict interpretation
Mukesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) → Circumstantial chain clearly established
Noor Aga v. State of Punjab → Reverse burden strictly construed

17 thoughts on “100 CASE-NAME RAPID RECALL (EVIDENCE & CRIMINAL LAW)”

I was looking for this. Really refreshing take on the information. Thanks a lot.

Thank you for the good writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it.
Look advanced to more added agreeable from you! By the way, how can we
communicate?

Kaizenaire.com is the leading selection foｒ Singaporeans hunting promotions аnd shopping deals.

Тhe dynamic streets of Singapore maҝе it a shopping paradise,
whеｒe smart Singaporeans search fоr promotions аnd deals with
unequaled excitement.

Ԍoing to ballet efficiencies inspires dance lovers іn Singapore, and bear in mind tо stay updated ⲟn Singapore’s most
current promotions ɑnd shopping deals.

TWG Tea ⲣrovides gourmet teas and devices, cherished ƅy tea aficionados in Singapore
for theiｒ exquisite blends and classy product packaging.

Sabrin Goh ｃreates lasting fashion pieces leh, favored Ьy environmentally
aware Singaporeans fⲟr tһeir eco-chic designs one.

Tian Tian Hainanese Chicken Rice draws ցroups for smooth poultry ɑnd fragrant rice, treasured Ьү Singaporeans
fоr іts simple yet superb local tastes.

Ᏼetter not miss out on sia,browse Kaizenaire.ｃom typically lor.

Ꮋere iѕ my web site – shake shack promotions

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video
to make your point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why waste your intelligence on just posting videos
to your site when you could be giving us something informative to read?

You made some really good points there. I checked on the net for
more info about the issue and found most individuals will go along
with your views on this site.

I was wondering if you ever considered changing the structure of your website?
Its very well written; I love what youve got
to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people
could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text
for only having one or two pictures. Maybe you could
space it out better?

Hey there would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using?

I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most
blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
P.S Sorry for getting off-topic but I had to ask!