Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh(1994) 4 SCC 260

Posted on by Admin

Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh

📌 Citation

(1994) 4 SCC 260
Bench: M. N. Venkatachaliah & S. Mohan

🔹 Background

Joginder Kumar, a young advocate, was taken to the police station for questioning but was not formally arrested. His family was not informed about his whereabouts. A habeas corpus petition was filed before the Supreme Court.

The case raised a crucial question:

👉 Can police arrest a person merely because they have the power to do so?

🔹 Core Legal Issue

Whether arrest without reasonable justification violates Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution.

🔹 Landmark Principles Laid Down

1️⃣ Arrest ≠ Routine Power

The Court held:

“No arrest can be made because it is lawful for the police officer to do so.”

Arrest must be justified, necessary, and reasonable.

Police must consider:

  • Whether arrest is required for investigation

  • Likelihood of accused absconding

  • Possibility of tampering with evidence

2️⃣ Right to Inform Relative/Friend

The Court directed that:

  • An arrested person has the right to inform a friend/relative.

  • Police must record in the diary who was informed.

  • The arrested person must be informed of this right.

This later influenced Section 50A CrPC and arrest guidelines.

3️⃣ Protection of Personal Liberty

Arbitrary arrest violates:

  • Article 21 – Right to life and personal liberty

  • Article 22(1) – Right to be informed of grounds of arrest

🔹 Relationship with Other Arrest & Bail Cases

This case laid groundwork for later safeguards in:

  • D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal – detailed arrest guidelines

  • Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar – restriction on automatic arrest in 498A cases

  • Dataram Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh – bail as rule

🔹 Exam-Oriented Key Line

“Joginder Kumar (1994) established that arrest cannot be mechanical and must be justified by necessity, reinforcing constitutional safeguards under Articles 21 and 22.”

🔹 Why This Case Matters for Bail Law

✔ Limits arbitrary arrest
✔ Strengthens liberty jurisprudence
✔ Forms foundation for bail-first philosophy
✔ Connects arrest power with constitutional proportionality

Related Posts

Case Study _ Economic Offence _ Bail

  • Admin
  • February 25, 2026
  • 0

PROBLEM-BASED ECONOMIC OFFENCE BAIL QUESTIONS 🧩 Problem 1 – Twin Conditions Test A is accused under PMLA.Investigation complete. Charge sheet filed.He argues: “No chance of absconding; I cooperated fully.” ❓ Is that enough for bail? ✅ Answer: No. Court must […]

BAIL REJECTION ORDER FORMAT

  • Admin
  • February 10, 2026
  • 0

BAIL REJECTION ORDER FORMAT (Regular Bail – Section 437 / 439 CrPC) IN THE COURT OF __________ (Judicial Magistrate / Sessions Court / High Court) Case Title:State vs. __________ Bail Application No.: __________FIR No.: __________Police Station: __________Sections: __________ ORDER This […]

33 thoughts on “Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh(1994) 4 SCC 260”

  2. We tested the app on iOS and the deposit flow completed without a hitch.

    BGaming, Yggdrasil, and Winfinity fill the 80-provider lobby.
    What we appreciate is the local payment focus. The
    welcome package reaches A$1,200 plus 300 free spins with 80+ providers.
    Neosurf and Paysafecard round out three local options.

    Most platforms setting $5 minimums either offer no welcome
    bonus eligibility or provide token matches like 10-25%
    that barely justify claiming. Each processes instant PayID deposits, maintains legitimate licensing, and provides game libraries worth playing beyond just claiming
    bonuses. Withdrawal processing averages 6-12 hours,
    slower than top-tier operators but completing same-day for business hours requests.
    Live dealer casino provides 80+ tables from Evolution Gaming and Pragmatic Play Live.
    The 3,000+ pokies collection balances major
    providers with boutique studios offering unique mechanics.

    MrPacho targets mid-range players with $750 maximum preventing excessive bonus commitments
    requiring unrealistic wagering volume.
    The six-tier VIP system rewards consistency, not deposit volume,
    which makes it unusually friendly to budget players. This guide
    ranks the ten that actually accept A$10 PayID deposits, names which trigger the welcome
    bonus at A$10 vs require more, and answers the practical questions A$10-budget Australian players keep getting
    wrong answers to elsewhere.
    With instant deposits, fast withdrawals, and secure banking,
    PayID provides a convenient and reliable payment method for casino players.
    ✔ Verify licence✔ Check withdrawal reputation✔ Avoid unrealistic bonuses✔ Test with small deposits
    first These bonuses can increase your bankroll and give you more chances to win.
    To stay safe, always choose casinos with strong reputations and positive player reviews.

    For regular play at trusted casino, larger deposits ($50-100) unlock better bonus tiers and reduce transaction frequency.
    Then concentrate subsequent deposits at 1-2 casinos that
    performed best during testing phase. Understanding this mathematics prevents unrealistic expectations
    about turning $10 deposits into $200 withdrawals through bonus optimization alone.

    At $1 per spin, the same $20 bankroll lasts only spins typically — nowhere near the 350 spins
    needed to clear even a fraction of requirements.
    Bet sizing discipline separates players who complete wagering requirements from those who bust prematurely.

    Here are the main casino bonuses you’ll come across at Aussie
    PayID casinos, and what to expect from each. In many cases,
    PayID casinos only allow PayID for deposits, and you’ll need to use a bank
    transfer or another method to withdraw your winnings.
    Depositing at online casinos that accept PayID is simple – enter the casino’s PayID details into your banking app and send.
    Below, we explain how PayID works, what to expect from
    the payment experience, and how to choose the best PayID casinos available to
    you. Because PayID is backed by major Australian banks,
    deposits are usually processed instantly, letting you start playing pokies,
    table games, and live dealer titles without entering long banking details or waiting for funds to clear.

    He uses mathematics and data-driven analysis
    to help readers get the best possible value from both casino games and sports betting.

    If you’re depositing A$10 specifically, choose NeoSpin or LuckyDreams
    to claim the bonus — or any casino on this list to play cash with no wagering strings.
    A$10 PayID players are heavily mobile-first — three of the operators we tested reported 80%+ of A$10-tier traffic on phones,
    vs 70% on larger-deposit accounts. A$10 isn’t a lot of bankroll, which
    means pokie selection matters more than at higher stakes. Wild Tokyo’s interface
    is the most polished of any operator we tested at the entry tier —
    Japanese-themed, fast-loading, with the cleanest small-balance display of any AU PayID casino.
    The pokies library runs to 6,400+ titles from 70+ providers including Pragmatic Play, Hacksaw
    Gaming, Nolimit City, Play’n GO and Push Gaming.
    10$ represents optimal minimum where bonuses activate, bankroll suffices for meaningful sessions, and transaction efficiency makes sense.
    Lower minimums rarely unlock bonuses, provide inadequate
    playing time (2-15 minutes), and offer poor value relative to $10 deposits.

    We achieved 100% successful A$10 PayID transfer rates across all
    seven banks tested at our top seven casinos. Submit ID, proof of address, and
    PayID identifier verification immediately after registering
    and your A$10 PayID withdrawal will process
    in 9-42 minutes at the casinos on this list.
    If you deposit A$10 PayID, win A$25, you can withdraw A$25
    (the casino’s standard minimum withdrawal applies,
    typically A$20-A$30).

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!