State of Rajasthan v. Balchand -(1977) 4 SCC 308

Posted on by Admin

State of Rajasthan v. Balchand

📌 Citation

(1977) 4 SCC 308
Decided by: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer

🔎 Facts of the Case

  • The accused Balchand was convicted by the trial court.

  • He applied for bail during the pendency of his appeal.

  • The High Court granted bail.

  • The State of Rajasthan challenged the order before the Supreme Court.

⚖️ Legal Issue

Whether bail should be granted to a convicted person pending appeal, and what principles should govern grant or refusal of bail?

🧑‍⚖️ Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s order granting bail.

Justice Krishna Iyer laid down the famous principle:

“Bail is the rule and jail is the exception.”

🏛️ Key Principles Laid Down

  1. Presumption of Innocence Continues (to some extent)
    Even after conviction, until appeal is finally decided, liberty should not be curtailed unnecessarily.

  2. Bail as a Norm
    The normal rule is to grant bail unless there are compelling reasons to deny it.

  3. Grounds to Refuse Bail
    Bail may be refused if:

    • There is risk of absconding

    • Accused may tamper with evidence

    • Likelihood of influencing witnesses

    • Serious threat to society

  4. Judicial Discretion Must Be Reasoned
    Bail decisions must be based on sound judicial principles, not mechanical refusal.

📚 Importance of the Case

  • This case is the foundation of modern bail jurisprudence in India.

  • Frequently cited in bail matters under:

    • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

    • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)

  • Followed and expanded in later cases like:

    • Gudikanti Narasimhulu v. Public Prosecutor

    • Sanjay Chandra v. CBI

    • Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI

📝 One-Line Exam Point

👉 State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977): Supreme Court held that “Bail is the rule, jail is the exception,” forming the cornerstone of Indian bail jurisprudence.

Related Posts

34 thoughts on “State of Rajasthan v. Balchand -(1977) 4 SCC 308”

  33. 부비와 부산비비기를 찾는 이용자를 위한 부산
    지역 정보 가이드입니다. 최신 공지 확인법, 후기 검증 기준,
    모바일 이용 방법과 안전 수칙을 확인하세요.

    Reply

  34. Hello, every time i used to check website posts here in the early hours in the break
    of day, since i enjoy to gain knowledge of more and more.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!