π₯ 1. Possession vs Title β Revenue Entry Not Conclusive
π Case Study
Plaintiff is in actual possession of land for many years. Defendant holds revenue record title and seeks to dispossess plaintiff. Plaintiff seeks temporary injunction.
βοΈ Leading Case
Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh, (1992) 1 SCC 719
π§ Ratio
-
Injunction is not granted on mere title
-
Court must see:
-
Prima facie case
-
Balance of convenience
-
Irreparable injury
-
-
Revenue entries β possession proof
π Exam Trick
π If plaintiff shows settled possession, injunction can be granted even against title holder.
π₯ 2. Injunction Cannot Protect Illegal Possession
π Case Study
Plaintiff forcibly occupies land recently and seeks injunction to prevent eviction.
βοΈ Leading Case
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes v. Erasmo Jack de Sequeira, (2012) 5 SCC 370
π§ Ratio
-
Courts must discourage illegal encroachers
-
Injunction is an equitable relief
-
Person approaching court must come with clean hands
π Exam Trick
π Even if defendant is absent, court can refuse injunction if possession is illegal.
π₯ 3. Negative Covenant & Contractual Injunction
π Case Study
Distributor bound by agreement not to deal with competitor. He violates and argues restraint of trade.
βοΈ Leading Case
Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co., (1995) 5 SCC 545
π§ Ratio
-
Injunction to enforce negative covenant is valid
-
Does not amount to restraint of trade
-
Section 27 Contract Act not violated
π Exam Trick
π Injunction can be granted even if contract is determinable, when negative covenant exists.
π 4. Mandatory Injunction at Interim Stage (Rare but Possible)
π Case Study
Defendant illegally blocks plaintiffβs access during pendency of suit. Plaintiff seeks restoration.
βοΈ Leading Case
Dorab Cawasji Warden v. Coomi Sorab Warden, (1990) 2 SCC 117
π§ Ratio
Interim mandatory injunction can be granted only when:
-
Strong prima facie case
-
Extreme hardship
-
Status quo ante needs restoration
π Exam Trick
π Mandatory injunction at interim stage is exception, not rule.
π 5. Injunction Refused When Damages Are Adequate Remedy
π Case Study
Plaintiff seeks injunction in commercial dispute though monetary compensation is possible.
βοΈ Leading Case
Best Sellers Retail v. Aditya Birla Nuvo, (2012) 6 SCC 792
π§ Ratio
-
Injunction is refused where:
-
Damages are quantifiable
-
No irreparable loss
-
-
Equity does not assist where money is sufficient remedy
π Exam Trick
π Always discuss irreparable injury separately.
π§Ύ ONE-PAGE EXAM MEMORY CHART
| Situation | Injunction? | Case |
|---|---|---|
| Possession without title | β Yes | Dalpat Kumar |
| Illegal encroacher | β No | Maria Margarida |
| Negative covenant | β Yes | Gujarat Bottling |
| Interim mandatory relief | β οΈ Rare | Dorab Warden |
| Money loss only | β No | Best Sellers |