One Liner Case Study – 50 – Negotiable Instrument Act

CASE STUDY 1 (MODEL CASE)

Facts:
Mr. Y issued a cheque of ₹10,000 to Mr. Z. The cheque was dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds and no overdraft facility.

(i) Is Mr. Y liable?

Yes.
All ingredients of Section 138 are fulfilled.

Consequences:

  • Imprisonment up to 2 years, or

  • Fine up to twice the cheque amount, or

  • Both.

(ii) If cheque was issued as a donation?

No liability under Section 138, because donation is not a legally enforceable debt or liability.


CASE STUDY 2

Facts:
Cheque issued for repayment of a friendly loan; dishonoured due to insufficient funds.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 attracted
(ii) ❌ If loan was gratuitous gift → No offence


CASE STUDY 3

Facts:
Cheque issued as advance payment for goods; goods not supplied; cheque dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ❌ No offence — no existing debt
(ii) ✔️ If advance later adjusted towards liability → Section 138 applies


CASE STUDY 4

Facts:
Cheque issued for time-barred debt; dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies
(ii) Because cheque amounts to promise under Section 25(3) Contract Act


CASE STUDY 5

Facts:
Cheque issued as security; liability arises later; cheque dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies if liability existed on presentation
(ii) ❌ If liability never arose


CASE STUDY 6

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured with remark “Account Closed”.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies
(ii) Punishable same as insufficiency of funds


CASE STUDY 7

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured due to “Stop Payment” instructions.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies
(ii) Unless drawer proves absence of debt


CASE STUDY 8

Facts:
Cheque issued for illegal consideration (gambling debt).

Answer:

(i) ❌ No offence
(ii) Debt not legally enforceable


CASE STUDY 9

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured due to mismatch of signature.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Section 138 not attracted
(ii) No valid execution of cheque


CASE STUDY 10

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured due to “Refer to Drawer”.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 presumed
(ii) Bank return memo sufficient


CASE STUDY 11

Facts:
Cheque issued by minor; dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ❌ No offence
(ii) Minor incapable of contracting


CASE STUDY 12

Facts:
Cheque issued from joint account; signed by one holder.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Signatory liable
(ii) Non-signing holder not liable


CASE STUDY 13

Facts:
Cheque issued by company; dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Company + persons in charge liable
(ii) Section 141 applies


CASE STUDY 14

Facts:
Cheque issued by director without role in company affairs.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Not liable
(ii) No vicarious liability without specific averments


CASE STUDY 15

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; notice sent after 30 days.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Complaint not maintainable
(ii) Mandatory time limit violated


CASE STUDY 16

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; notice refused by drawer.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Deemed service
(ii) Section 138 applies


CASE STUDY 17

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; notice sent by email only.

Answer:

(i) ⚠️ Valid if receipt proved
(ii) RPAD preferred


CASE STUDY 18

Facts:
Complaint filed before expiry of 15 days from notice.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Premature complaint
(ii) Not maintainable


CASE STUDY 19

Facts:
Cheque presented multiple times; dishonoured.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Notice after last dishonour valid
(ii) MSR Leathers case


CASE STUDY 20

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; partial payment made after notice.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Complaint maintainable for balance
(ii) Liability survives


CASE STUDY 21

Facts:
Cheque amount exceeds actual debt.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Section 138 fails
(ii) Excess amount unenforceable


CASE STUDY 22

Facts:
Cheque issued for oral loan.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies
(ii) Presumption under Sections 118 & 139


CASE STUDY 23

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured due to technical alteration.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Cheque void
(ii) Material alteration invalidates instrument


CASE STUDY 24

Facts:
Cheque signed blank; later filled by payee.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Valid under Section 20
(ii) Presumption applies


CASE STUDY 25

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused denies loan.

Answer:

(i) Presumption favours complainant
(ii) Accused must rebut on probability


CASE STUDY 26

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; complainant lacks financial capacity.

Answer:

(i) Accused must raise probable defence
(ii) Mere suggestion insufficient


CASE STUDY 27

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused does not lead evidence.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Not fatal
(ii) Cross-examination sufficient


CASE STUDY 28

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; complaint filed in wrong jurisdiction.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Not maintainable
(ii) Must be filed where payee bank situated


CASE STUDY 29

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; complainant dies.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Legal heirs may continue
(ii) Cause survives


CASE STUDY 30

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; parties settle during trial.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Compounding allowed
(ii) Damodar Prabhu case


CASE STUDY 31

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; appeal filed without deposit.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Appeal defective
(ii) 20% deposit mandatory


CASE STUDY 32

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused absconds.

Answer:

(i) Trial may proceed
(ii) NBW may be issued


CASE STUDY 33

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; cheque issued as gift.

Answer:

(i) ❌ No offence
(ii) No legally enforceable debt


CASE STUDY 34

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; cash loan above ₹20,000.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Enforceable
(ii) Income-tax violation irrelevant


CASE STUDY 35

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused claims coercion.

Answer:

(i) Accused must prove coercion
(ii) Presumption continues


CASE STUDY 36

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; drawer deceased before trial.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Criminal liability abates
(ii) Civil remedy survives


CASE STUDY 37

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; wrong cheque number mentioned in notice.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Defective notice
(ii) Complaint fails


CASE STUDY 38

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; notice demanded interest only.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Invalid notice
(ii) Cheque amount must be demanded


CASE STUDY 39

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused claims cheque lost.

Answer:

(i) Defence must be proved
(ii) Mere plea insufficient


CASE STUDY 40

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; foreign cheque.

Answer:

(i) ❌ NI Act not applicable
(ii) Outside territorial scope


CASE STUDY 41

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused pleads mental illness.

Answer:

(i) Must prove incapacity
(ii) Otherwise liable


CASE STUDY 42

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; issued for partnership liability.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Firm + partners liable
(ii) If in charge of business


CASE STUDY 43

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused repays after filing complaint.

Answer:

(i) Offence complete
(ii) May mitigate sentence


CASE STUDY 44

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; complainant not payee but holder in due course.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Complaint maintainable
(ii) Section 9 applies


CASE STUDY 45

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; account dormant.

Answer:

(i) ✅ Section 138 applies
(ii) Equivalent to insufficiency


CASE STUDY 46

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused claims no mens rea.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Mens rea not required
(ii) Strict liability offence


CASE STUDY 47

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; signature admitted but debt denied.

Answer:

(i) Presumption applies
(ii) Burden on accused


CASE STUDY 48

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; complaint filed beyond limitation.

Answer:

(i) ❌ Unless delay condoned
(ii) Section 142(b)


CASE STUDY 49

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; accused claims cheque issued under mistake.

Answer:

(i) Must prove mistake
(ii) Otherwise liable


CASE STUDY 50

Facts:
Cheque dishonoured; cheque issued as donation.

Answer:

(i) ❌ No offence
(ii) Absence of legally enforceable debt

6 thoughts on “One Liner Case Study – 50 – Negotiable Instrument Act

  1. Terrific post however , I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more
    on this topic? I’d be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit more.
    Bless you!

  2. Individuals who are 40 years old and above
    face a higher likelihood of experiencing prostatitis.
    Studies suggest that nearly one out of every three
    men in this age group is affected by prostate inflammation.Prostatitis (mtthub.org).

  3. Undfeniably bslieve hat which yoou stated. Yourr favofite reason appeared tto
    be onn the internet thhe easiext thig too bee aweare of. I ssay tto you, I definitel
    geet amnoyed whilpe pekple think abouut worries thhat they juist ddo noot knnow about.
    You managed tto hhit the nail upln thee top and also define outt the whoke tthing withoput havung ide efvfect ,
    people couldd take a signal. Will prdobably bee bback too gett more.
    Thanjks xnxx

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!