β Case Analysis
CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Citation | (1992) 3 SCC 141 : AIR 1992 SC 1768 |
| Bench | Justice K. Jayachandra Reddy & Justice S. Mohan |
| Subject | Police Custody Remand under Section 167 CrPC |
| Key Provision | Section 167(2) CrPC |
| BNSS Equivalent | Section 187 BNSS |
π Facts of the Case
-
The accused was arrested by Central Bureau of Investigation in a criminal case.
-
The Magistrate initially granted police custody remand.
-
After some days, the accused was sent to judicial custody.
-
Later the investigating agency again requested police custody during the same 15-day period.
-
The legal question arose regarding whether police custody can be granted again after the accused has been sent to judicial custody.
β Legal Issue
Whether police custody remand can be granted after the accused has already been remanded to judicial custody during the first 15 days under Section 167 CrPC?
π§ Judgment
The Supreme Court of India clarified the interpretation of Section 167 CrPC and laid down the governing rule of remand.
The Court held:
β Police custody can be granted only within the first 15 days from the date of first remand.
β Within these first 15 days, the Magistrate may grant police custody or judicial custody in parts.
β However, after the first 15 days expire, the accused cannot be remanded to police custody.
β After 15 days, only judicial custody is permissible.
π Rule of Remand (From the Judgment)
| Period | Custody Allowed |
|---|---|
| First 15 days from first remand | Police custody or judicial custody |
| After 15 days | Only judicial custody |
| Up to 60 / 90 days investigation | Judicial custody only |
β Important Observation of the Court
The Court observed:
βPolice custody is permissible only during the first fifteen days of remand and thereafter the accused can only be kept in judicial custody.β
β CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni
π Practical Importance for Magistrates
This judgment governs daily remand practice in Magistrate Courts.
It clarifies:
β Police custody cannot be granted after 15 days
β Police custody cannot be revived later
β Custody can be split within the first 15 days
β Example for Court Practice
| Day | Custody |
|---|---|
| Day 1 | 5 days police custody |
| Day 6 | judicial custody |
| Day 10 | again police custody possible |
| Day 16 | β police custody not allowed |
π Interaction with Later Judgments
| Case | Principle |
|---|---|
| CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni | Police custody only within first 15 days |
| State v. Dawood Ibrahim Kaskar | Police custody possible if accused arrested later in same case |
| Pradeep Ram v. State of Jharkhand | Fresh remand possible in different case |
π Position under BNSS
| CrPC | BNSS |
|---|---|
| Section 167 | Section 187 BNSS |
| First 15 days rule | Still applicable |
| Police custody restriction | Continues |
Thus, principle of Anupam Kulkarni still governs remand law even after BNSS.
π§ One-Line Ratio (Judiciary Exam Style)
βPolice custody remand can be granted only during the first fifteen days from the date of initial remand; thereafter only judicial custody is permissible.β
β CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni