⚖️ PCPNDT Act, 1994 – Exam Summary

🔹 Objective

To prohibit sex selection (before or after conception) and prevent misuse of prenatal diagnostic techniques for female foeticide, thereby improving the sex ratio.

---

🔹 Key Definitions (Section 2)

• Sex Selection: Selection of sex before/after conception
• Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques: Ultrasound, amniocentesis, etc.
• Genetic Counselling Centre / Laboratory / Clinic: Facilities conducting such tests

---

🔹 Core Prohibitions

🚫 Section 3A & 3B

• Prohibits sex selection and sale/use of sex selection techniques

🚫 Section 4

• Prenatal diagnostic techniques allowed only for specific medical purposes, such as:
  • Chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genetic metabolic diseases
  • Congenital anomalies
• Sex determination strictly prohibited

🚫 Section 5

• Written consent of pregnant woman mandatory
• No communication of sex of foetus

🚫 Section 6

• Absolute ban on sex determination

---

🔹 Regulatory Mechanism

---

🔹 Important Compliance Requirement

👉 Form F (most litigated issue)

• Mandatory record for every prenatal test
• Incomplete/incorrect Form F = violation

---

🔹 Punishments (Section 23)

---

🔹 Presumption Clause

• Burden shifts on accused in case of non-maintenance of records
  👉 Strong reverse burden provision

---

🔹 Nature of Offence

• Cognizable, non-bailable, non-compoundable

---

⚖️ Landmark Judgments (Exam Must-Know)

1. ➤ Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) v. Union of India

Ratio:

• SC directed strict implementation of PCPNDT Act
• Mandatory registration and monitoring of clinics
  👉 Foundation case for enforcement

---

2. ➤ Voluntary Health Association of Punjab v. Union of India

Ratio:

• Strong directions to curb female foeticide
• Emphasized strict action against violators
  👉 Important for policy & compliance

---

3. ➤ Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI) v. Union of India

Ratio:

• Clarified procedural aspects and compliance expectations
  👉 Balance between regulation & medical practice

---

📊 Quick Chart (For Revision)

---

🔹 Common Judicial Issues

• Incomplete Form F → conviction possible
• Whether mens rea required? → often strict liability
• Validity of suspension of registration
• Delay in filing complaint

---

🧾 Ready-to-Use Judicial Line

“The PCPNDT Act is a social welfare legislation enacted to curb the menace of female foeticide, and therefore requires strict compliance; even procedural lapses like improper maintenance of Form F attract penal consequences.”

---

📌 One-Line Exam Note

👉 “PCPNDT Act imposes strict regulation on diagnostic techniques to prevent sex selection, with reverse burden and stringent penalties.” 

📊 PCPNDT Act – Case Law vs Sections Mapping Chart

---

🔹 Key Takeaways for Exams / Judgments

• CEHAT case (2001) → Foundation for implementation & regulation
• Voluntary Health Association case (2013) → Strict enforcement + policy directions
• FOGSI case (2019) → Procedural compliance (Form F, registration issues)

---

🧾 Ready-to-Use Judicial Line

“The scheme of the PCPNDT Act, as interpreted in Voluntary Health Association of Punjab v. Union of India and Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) v. Union of India, mandates strict compliance, with even procedural lapses such as improper maintenance of Form F attracting penal consequences due to the larger social objective of preventing female foeticide.”