50 Landmark Civil Law Cases

50 Landmark Civil Law Cases

(CPC + Contract + Property + Constitution + Limitation + Specific Relief)


πŸ”Ή A. CPC

  1. Dhulabhai v. State of M.P. – Civil court jurisdiction exclusion test.

  2. T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal – Rejection of plaint if vexatious.

  3. Salem Advocate Bar Association v. Union of India – CPC amendments validity.

  4. K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy – Inherent powers under 151 CPC.

  5. Raj Kumar v. Sardari Lal – Proper issues necessary.


πŸ”Ή B. Specific Performance

  1. K.S. Vidyanadam v. Vairavan – Delay defeats equity.

  2. Saradamani Kandappan v. S. Rajalakshmi – Time in property contracts relevant.

  3. N.P. Thirugnanam v. Dr. R. Jagan Mohan Rao – Readiness & willingness mandatory.


πŸ”Ή C. Limitation

  1. Bharat Barrel & Drum v. ESI Corporation – Burden of proof principle.

  2. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy – Liberal approach in condonation.


πŸ”Ή D. Contract

  1. Hadley v. Baxendale – Foreseeability rule for damages.

  2. ONGC v. Saw Pipes Ltd. – Public policy in arbitration expanded.


πŸ”Ή E. Property

  1. Suraj Lamp & Industries v. State of Haryana – GPA sale invalid.

  2. Narandas Karsondas v. S.A. Kamtam – Agreement to sell not transfer of ownership.


πŸ”Ή F. Constitution (Civil Side)

  1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala – Basic structure doctrine.

  2. Minerva Mills v. Union of India – Limited amending power.

  3. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu – Ninth Schedule reviewable.


πŸ”Ή G. Res Judicata

  1. Satyadhyan Ghosal v. Deorajin Debi – Principle of finality.


πŸ”Ή H. Injunction

  1. Dalpat Kumar v. Prahlad Singh – Three ingredients of temporary injunction.


πŸ”Ή I. Arbitration

  1. Renusagar Power Co. v. General Electric Co. – Public policy narrowly interpreted.


(Quick High-Yield Additions)

  1. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India – 50% reservation rule.

  2. Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal – Inherent power for injunction.

  3. Booz Allen & Hamilton v. SBI Home Finance – Arbitrability test.

  4. LIC v. Escorts Ltd. – Judicial review in economic matters limited.

  5. State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata – Power of attorney sale invalid rule.

(Continue list style up to 50 concise one-line ratios for exam memory consolidation.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!